Passer au contenu

Maghreb Online

Algérie Maroc News

Menu principal
  • Accueil
  • Maroc
  • Algérie
  • Mauritanie
  • Tunisie
  • Libye
  • Maghreb
  • Sahel
  • Afrique
  • Opinions & analyses
  • Monde
  • Sahara Occidental
  • Politique de cookies (UE)
  • Monde

Feds cite efforts to obstruct probe of docs at Trump estate

Admin 31 août 2022

Donald Trump, Classified documents, investigation,

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department said Tuesday that classified documents were “likely concealed and removed” from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate as part of an effort to obstruct the federal investigation into the discovery of the government records.

The FBI also seized 33 boxes containing more than 100 classified records during its Aug. 8 search of Mar-a-Lago and found classified documents stashed in Trump’s office, according to a filing that lays out the most detailed chronology to date of months of strained interactions between Justice Department officials and Trump representatives over the discovery of government secrets.

The filing offers yet another indication of the sheer volume of classified records retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. It shows how investigators conducting a criminal probe have focused not just on why the records were improperly stored there, but also on the question of whether the Trump team intentionally misled them about the continued, and unlawful, presence of the top secret documents.

The timeline laid out by the Justice Department made clear that the extraordinary search of Mar-a-Lago came only after other efforts to retrieve the records had failed, and that it resulted from law enforcement suspicion that additional documents remained inside the property despite assurances by Trump representatives that a “diligent search” had accounted for all of the material.

It also included a picture of some of the seized documents bearing clear classification markings, perhaps as a way to rebut suggestions that whoever packed them or was handling them could have easily failed to appreciate their sensitive nature.

The photo shows the cover pages of a smattering of paperclip-bound classified documents — some marked as “TOP SECRET//SCI” with bright yellow borders, and one marked as “SECRET//SCI” with a rust-colored border — along with whited-out pages, splayed out on a carpet at Mar-a-Lago. Beside them sits a cardboard box filled with gold-framed pictures, including a Time magazine cover.

Though it contains significant new details on the investigation, the Justice Department filing does not resolve a core question that has driven public fascination with the investigation — why Trump held onto the documents after he left the White House and why he and his team resisted repeated efforts to give them back. In fact, it suggests officials may not have received an answer.

During a June 3 visit to Mar-a-Lago by FBI and Justice Department officials, the document states, “Counsel for the former President offered no explanation as to why boxes of government records, including 38 documents with classification markings, remained at the Premises nearly five months after the production of the Fifteen Boxes and nearly one-and-a-half years after the end of the Administration.”

That visit to Mar-a-Lago, which came weeks after the Justice Department issued a subpoena for the records, receives substantial attention in the document and appears to be a key investigative focus.

Though Trump has said he had declassified all of the documents at Mar-a-Lago, his lawyers did not suggest that during the visit and instead “handled them in a manner that suggested counsel believed that the documents were classified,” according to the document.

FBI agents who went there to receive additional materials were given “a single Redweld envelope, double-wrapped in tape, containing the documents,” the filing states.

That envelope, according to the FBI, contained 38 unique documents with classification markings, including five documents marked confidential, 16 marked secret and 17 marked top secret.

During that visit, the document says, Trump’s lawyers told investigators that all the records that had come from the White House were stored in one location — a Mar-a-Lago storage room — and that “there were no other records stored in any private office space or other location at the Premises and that all available boxes were searched.”

After that, though, the Justice Department, which had subpoenaed video footage for the property, “developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation.” The filing does not identify the individuals who may have relocated the boxes.

In their August search, agents found classified documents both in the storage room as well as in the former president’s office — including three classified documents found not in boxes, but in office desks.


“That the FBI, in a matter of hours, recovered twice as many documents with classification markings as the ‘diligent search’ that the former President’s counsel and other representatives had weeks to perform calls into serious question the representations made in the June 3 certification and casts doubt on the extent of cooperation in this matter,” the document states.

It says, “In some instances, even the FBI counterintelligence personnel and DOJ attorneys conducting the review required additional clearances before they were permitted to review certain documents.”

The investigation began from a referral from the National Archives and Records Administration, which recovered 15 boxes from Mar-a-Lago in January that were found to contain 184 documents with classified markings, including top secret information.

The purpose of the Tuesday night filing was to oppose a request from the Trump legal team for a special master to review the documents seized during this month’s search and set aside those protected by claims of legal privilege. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon is set to hear arguments on the matter on Thursday.

Cannon on Saturday said it was her “preliminary intent” to appoint such a person but also gave the Justice Department an opportunity to respond.

On Monday, the department said it had already completed its review of potentially privileged documents and identified a “limited set of materials that potentially contain attorney-client privileged information.” It said Tuesday that a special master was therefore “unnecessary.”

In a separate development, the Trump legal team has grown with the addition of another attorney. Chris Kise, Florida’s former solicitor general, has joined the team of lawyers representing Trump, according to two people familiar with the matter who were not authorized to discuss the move by name and spoke on condition of anonymity. Kise did not return messages seeking comment.

Associated Press, 31/08/2022

#Trump #Mar_a_Lago #classified_documents

Visited 10 times, 1 visit(s) today

À propos de l'auteur

Admin

Administrator

Visitez le site Web Afficher tous les messages
Partagez
Tweet

Post navigation

Previous: Trump a probablement dissimulé des documents classifiés
Next: Algérie : Macron n’a pas effacé les cicatrices coloniales

Histoires connexes

ghsilaine melania
  • Monde

Les dossiers Epstein révèlent un e-mail de 2002 de Melania Trump à Ghislaine Maxwell

Admin 31 janvier 2026 0
trump epstein
  • Monde

Affaire Epstein : Principales révélations des dernières publications

Admin 31 janvier 2026 0
maroc mauritanie poignée
  • Monde

beIN Sports : Un journaliste marocain ravive les tensions entre la Mauritanie et Rabat

Admin 29 janvier 2026 0
  • Bill Clinton et Epstein : une présence controversée au mariage du roi du Maroc en 2002
  • Morocco AFCON : When African Football Loses Its Soul
  • Trump’s plan for Western Sahara, according to a Swedish think tank
  • El plan americano para el Sáhara Occidental (African Security Analysis)
  • Le Sahara Occidental à un tournant stratégique (African Security Analysis)

Top 10

  • Maroc : Jabaroot publie une liste de personnes dont…
  • النص الكامل لمقال لوموند الذي أثار غضب المغرب
  • France-Maroc-Algérie-Tunisie-Sahara Occidental :…
  • Ce que le Maroc cache sur la grave maladie du roi…
  • Le roi du Maroc Mohammed VI en état de mort clinique…
  • Projet de résolution du Conseil de Sécurité sur le…
  • Prostitution, Marrakech is Moroccan capital of paid sex
  • Maroc: Selon le hacker Jabaroot, la DST s’est…
  • Maroc : le hacker Jabaroot dévoile la fortune…
  • La crise pousse le Maroc a autoriser la prostitution…

Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews par AF themes.
Gérer le consentement
Pour offrir les meilleures expériences, nous utilisons des technologies telles que les cookies pour stocker et/ou accéder aux informations des appareils. Le fait de consentir à ces technologies nous permettra de traiter des données telles que le comportement de navigation ou les ID uniques sur ce site. Le fait de ne pas consentir ou de retirer son consentement peut avoir un effet négatif sur certaines caractéristiques et fonctions.
Fonctionnel Toujours activé
L’accès ou le stockage technique est strictement nécessaire dans la finalité d’intérêt légitime de permettre l’utilisation d’un service spécifique explicitement demandé par l’abonné ou l’utilisateur, ou dans le seul but d’effectuer la transmission d’une communication sur un réseau de communications électroniques.
Préférences
L’accès ou le stockage technique est nécessaire dans la finalité d’intérêt légitime de stocker des préférences qui ne sont pas demandées par l’abonné ou l’internaute.
Statistiques
Le stockage ou l’accès technique qui est utilisé exclusivement à des fins statistiques. Le stockage ou l’accès technique qui est utilisé exclusivement dans des finalités statistiques anonymes. En l’absence d’une assignation à comparaître, d’une conformité volontaire de la part de votre fournisseur d’accès à internet ou d’enregistrements supplémentaires provenant d’une tierce partie, les informations stockées ou extraites à cette seule fin ne peuvent généralement pas être utilisées pour vous identifier.
Marketing
L’accès ou le stockage technique est nécessaire pour créer des profils d’internautes afin d’envoyer des publicités, ou pour suivre l’utilisateur sur un site web ou sur plusieurs sites web ayant des finalités marketing similaires.
  • Gérer les options
  • Gérer les services
  • Gérer {vendor_count} fournisseurs
  • En savoir plus sur ces finalités
Voir les préférences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}