Tags : Marruecos, Western Sahara, Estados Unidos, Frente Polisario, Israel, Zionismo,
By Pablo Jofré Leal
First of all, this work involves considering a series of elements related to the paper of manipulation, misinformation and use of pressure groups in the countries (lobby) brought to bear by the governments of the United States, Marruecos and the Zionism, together with the media of information, funds, organization of fachada and the propias embajadas of these countries to imponer su narrative and así impedir, like objectivo, la autodeterminación, tanto del pueblo saharaui like el Palestine.
Se a lo encionado el trabajo de zapajo de los servicios de intelligence, que no sólo generan process de desequilibrio y división en los países, sino que dedican sus esfuerzos a nourisher de contenido falsario a la narrative que será defundida por los medias de manipulation y misinformación, tergiversando la historia, de manera tal de accrecentar las violaciones al derecho a la autodeterminación del pueblo saharaui y palestino.
In the specific case of the Saharawi village, it was found that the funds financed by the brown monarchy were the case of Atalayar who left the job of servile employees. A medium that only publishes articles, akin to “deep” investigation into which the unique object is based on the pretensions of the feudal monarchy to annex Western Sahara.
Socios en el crimen: Mohamed VI and Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Saharawi authorities have signaled that the resolutions of the Organization of the United Nations (UN) have given rise to the clarity of the derecho of self-determination of the Saharawi population, as follows from the dictamen of the Corte Internacional de Justicia of 1975, by Rabat simply in its letter dead, in a clear violation of international law. Objectivo por el cual moeve sus hilos y gasta cientos de millions of dólares annually en tratar de convencer que anexionar o “conceder” una autonomy relativa son políticas de enorme generosidad con relación que no perdece y que ha sido ha sido definido por la Corte Internacional de Justicia y numerosas UN resolutions.
We record that the theme of autonomy is not a concept that is born of the feudal monarchy. In the SADR’s initiatory propia to remove the theme of self-determination and that it took place in the referendum, a few years later, it signaled that it was very likely that the proprietor would decide for the population of Western Sahara. The Anexion to Marruecos, the autonomy in certain materials and the complete self-determination. Aside from the fact that the backs of the three preguntas favored by Marruecos, this monarchy and its civil military government are completely denied by the sabe that will be destroyed.
We have taken a process of occupancy and colonization since the year 1975, declared illegal, recognized as tal and which also violated the plan of arreglo that was firmed between the Frente Polisario – Frente Popular para Liberación de Saguia al Hamra y Río de Oro – and the monarchy marroquí firmado para el These were the days of the 1991 year. These hostilities were generated as fruit, the conformation of a mission destined to lead a referendum for the history of Saharawi self-determination.
The name MINURSO (Misión de las Naciones Unidas para el Referendum en el Sahara Occidental). Only Trump and Netanyahu – like no – are inclined to reconceive an annexation of the Saharawi territory. Loss of intent to do so is in the event of a crash, as the fall of October 4, 2024 of the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Union Europea, in the sentences dictated by the Gran Sala confirmed the illegality of the EU-Marruecos accused, due to the vulnerability of the consent of the Saharawi pueblo and its permanent soberanía over its natural recursos.
The Saharawi authorities face this han sostenido that “Frente the irresponsible actuación of some European States, in particular France and Spain, that, amid unilateral decisions, creyeron poder to alter the international status of the territory, the sentences of the Tribunal recuerdan con firmeza que la cuestión del Western Sahara It is a question of descolonization and that there is no other solution than the strict respect of the derecho of the Saharawi population to self-determination and independence (2)
A violado por España, ex colonial power of Western Sahara. With obligations in the international derecho, uncomplidas una y otra vez por la ex metropolis. Pedro Sánchez as president of Spain is one of the longest listed renegades who left ex-president Felipe Gonzalez who swore to defend the freedom of the Saharawi people, to serve as the testafer and the main lobista in political and diplomatic matters of the Marruecos.
In 1976, Felipe González, ex-Spanish president and leader of the PSOE, traveled to the camps of Saharan refugees in Tinduf. Compromise on its end: “Nuestro partido estará con vosotros hasta la victoria final”.
All of this is generously gratified and it means incrementing the bags of food with the blood of this politically friendly person. Sin duda, la decisión de Marruecos y con ello las órdenes dadas a sus Embajadas por el mundo y catalizar la comprar de conciencias y voluntades entre politicians, parlamentarios, periodistas y organizaciones se ha intensifado gracias al beneplace de la segunda administration de Donald Trump.
On the 9th of April, the Secretary of State of North America, Marco Rubio, during a meeting in Washington with the Minister of Exteriors of Marruecos, Nasser Burita, signaled that it signified a vara de medida, de referencia, de servil sometimiento, para que los gobiernos y políticos rastreros a Washington comiencen a sostener frente al saharaui theme “recognizes the marroquí soberanía in Western Sahara and supports the promise of serial autonomy, creíble and realista of Marruecos as a unique basis for a just and lasting solution to the dispute”. The criminal line at that time is the sum of our gobiernos, parlamentarios and medios comprados por el dinero marroquí tal como lo stuve en la parte I de este trabajo.
Iran in the dance
However, it is the same thing that this political life is eco-friendly and politically determined, it includes the strategy of most people in the Saharawi, as well as in Palestine, as violent societies, as terrorist movements and in alliance with countries that the United States define as part of an eje de resistance that lucha contra “occidente y sus valores”
In the plan of media and international organizations promoting it is the Fundación para la Defense de la Democracia – FDD abbreviatura de la Foundation for Defense of Democracies – organization dedicated to the elaboration of studies in external politics and themes that call national security established, sacred to the light Publicly informed, the pasado 17 de April (3) donde en el marco de la policy de máxima presión contra Irán acusa ación persa de estar implicated en planes de desestabilización en el nord de África, en la zone del Magreb. A repeated tendency to sign the men of the world is sea in China, Russia and this is the case in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The charge was also presented to Argelia by the people of China as a source of support for the stability of the country by this information that goes to the intense lobby of the brown monarchy that drives the need to liberate the territories of the Saharawi Arab Republic Democracy – in the Western Sahara – ancient Spanish colony, occupied militarily and with miles of marroquíes colonists, violando con ello el derecho a la autodeterminación del pueblo saharaui.
Este información de la FDD es parte de una dynamica narrative destinada a exhibir la legítima lucha del pueblo saharaui y el Frente Polisario – que es su legítimo representative – as a “fenómeno que arouse una preocupación cada vez mayor en la comunidad internacional, a saber, la instrumentalización e internationalization of the difference over the Sáhara por parte de actors estatales y non estatales, en particular Irán y sus aliados”.
HESPRESS: Campaign against the POLISARIO Frente
The hipocresía and peligrosidad expressed in this form represent our interests and the vision of no one else but one of the financiers of the FDD, but also of the government of Donald Trump, who has expressed in addition to an opportunity that the Western Sahara must be annexed to Marruecos. Idea legal that adition to the inefible France of Macron, old metropolis of Marruecos, as well as Spain, but in the agony of the dictator Francisco Franco followed the aspirations and decisions respecting the self-determination of the Saharawi population.
A country that does not fulfill one of its obligations as a former colonial authority, administration of the Western Sahara, and which has the obligation to guarantee the process of decolonization and does not endorse the brown occupation. Hoy, the gobierno of Pedro Sánchez, which only vociferar sobre sur presunto character de izquierda, ha mostrado su verdadera cara: un gobierno promarroquí y subjecto a las presiones de Francia y Estados Unidos.
Para el información de la FDD, endowed with an alta dose of political fiction, the government of Iran uses the Frente Polisario – denominándolo movement separatista con base en los campsamentos de Tinduf, en Argelia- as a strategic extension of its military influence in the region, validation of the operational responsibility of Hezbolá and of an active red diplomat encabezada by its Embajada in Argel. A missing narrative emerged from the reporting laboratories to desequilibrate the countries, from the servicios and their servile “tanks of ideas” in the United States, France and with apoyo sionista and español.
To follow this type of legacy, it is embedded in the strategy of disinformation and manipulation by the Hudson Institute which signals that “the Polisario Front is not a movement of liberation: it is a destabilizing militia responsible for Iran, its victims with Hezbollah, the PKK and the insurgents of the Sahel. resistance of the peoples.
The evidence of this verborrea plagada of falsehoods reflects the object of invisibilizing the existence of a village that is due to its self-determination as it is the Saharawi. Ligar a irán y Argelia in an alliance that para este informa refleja a peligro para el norte de Africa, aprovechando la policy de máxima presión y demonización de la nación persa. This is, driven by Washington and its Zionist cervatillos and marroquíes, ambos con fuertes lazos en materia de corruption, agresiones y exterminio de pueblos como el Palestine y el Saharaui.
First, Iran has no military presence in the Maghreb, but has no influence on strategic matters, mainly in the area of Western Asia – logical area for its secure property – In the second place, the Polisario Front is not a separatist movement for a simple reason, the Saharawi Democratic Republic is recognized by more than 90 countries, with the exception of the brown occupation regime.
However, it is difficult to know about an organization like the Polisario that propagandizes the separation when the UN property is included in a dictamen of the Corte Internacional de Justicia de la Haya – organismo dependente de la ONU – from the year 1974 estableció that Marruecos does not hold any legal vínculo, neither historical nor cultural with the Western Sahara and that its legitimate due is the Saharawi pueblo.
Dictamen emitido tras la petition de Marruecos, regido por Hassan II, en diciembre del año 1974 que propuso ante la Asamblea General una opinion consultiva sobre el Sáhara Occidental (5) Aceptada en la resolution 3292 (XXIX) y yo objectivo will be obtained respuesta ante dos preguntas:
-Si The Sáhara was a territory sin dueño (Terra Nullius) before Spanish occupation.
-If there exists a relationship of soberanía of this territory with Marruecos and Mauritania.
This opinion was consulted before the ICJ on October 16, 1975, and it was resolved with clarity that the Western Sahara has a reason, no time has come and it is a legitimate reason and without discussion of the Sahara pueblo.
Therefore, no vinculos de soberanía exist between the Sáhara and Marruecos. The Court resolved that “neither the internal nor the international acts are based on Marruecos indicating, in the relevant period, the existence or international recognition of legal jurisdictions of territorial sovereignty between the Western Sahara and the Marroquí State. Estado, no muestran que Marruecos ejerciera ninguna actividad estatal efectiva y exclusiva en el Sahara Occidental “.
Continua esta resolución “…the Court llegó has the conclusion that the elements and information can be available without demonstrating the existence of any vínculo de soberanía territorial entre el territorio del Western Sahara, por una part, y el Reino de Marruecos o el complejo mauritano, por la Furthermore, the Court does not agree that there are legal documents capable of modifying the application of the resolution 1514 (XV) in which it refers to the descolonization of Western Sahara and, in particular, to the application of the principle of freedom determination by the free and authentic expression of the will of the populations of the territory.”
It is dictamen that the only pretensions of marroquíes were driven by an action propia of a totalitarian regime like the marroquí monarch: el vamos a la llamada Marcha Verde (6) interesadamente utilizando el color del Islam para una action clearly más cerca del color rojo de la sangre de las sangre Marroquíes banderas esgrimidas en aquel miento. A march conforming to 350 thousand marroquís (between civilians and militaries) which entered into the Saharawi territory to pressure the Spanish troops to withdraw from the territory.
Marcha que el inicio de la invasion y colonización del Western Sahara, bajo el beneplácito y traición de la monarchy española ya regida por Juan Carlos I, delfín del dictator Franco – quien fallece pocos días después tras a long agonía – Un Juan Carlos que se consideraba el hermano menor de Hassan II y queen Terminaría de traicionar a pueblo saharaui con el llamado Acuerdo tripartito de Madrid, firmado el 14 de noviembre de 1975 y que entregó a manos de la rapiña de Marruecos y Mauritania la tierra y el pueblo saharaui (7). At 50 years from the beginning of the occupation and colonization of the Western Sahara, the loss of self-determination is more present than ever in the Saharawi population. Your resistance goes a long way with your dignity.
It is interesting to note that, including the artificial intelligence of creative companies, mainly, it is in the hands of hegemonic powers before the questioner, so the Saharawi society affirmed: “The Saharawi community, in 2025, will be geographically divided and will be able to do so Self-determination Part of the population resides in the zone occupied by Marruecos, other in the “Zona Libre” controlled by the Saharawi Democratic Republic and the restaurant in refugee camps in Argelia, the village maintains a strong identity and lucha. el derecho a decidir su propio futuro” (8) Así es, no hay discusión alguna a esta reality.
Notes:
The promises made, include a status of autonomy, the creation of an autonomous region of the Sahara with its ejecutivo, parlamento, poder judicial, fuerzas policiales, capacidad tributaria propia en determinadas materias, competencias en materia de vivienda, culture, deportes, promoción económica, infrastructure. The Marroquí queda as responsible for the national defense, background legislation, external relations, attributes propios de la soberanía del Estado (himno national, bandera, moneda, entre otros). ( ECSAHARAUI )
FDD.ORG
Atalayar
Se llegó aquella consulta por una serie de hechos. Among them that, in August of 1974, Spain – the colonial power in the Western Sahara – announced to the UN, that in the first half of 1975 rose to the realization of the Referendum of Self-determination of the Saharawi population under the auspices and guarantees of the United Nations. Spain is committed to adopting the necessary measures so that the indigenous inhabitants of the territory rely on their free determination in accordance with the resolutions of the UN. The decision alerted the monarchy to the fact that, in a legal referendum, international taxation was not possible under any circumstances.
Resumen Latinoamericano
On November 14, 1975, there were one of the most relevant incidents in the history of the Western Sahara conflict. And yet one of the most vergonzantes of Spanish history. España, that during these years of había estado in the territory, firmaba in Madrid the “Declaration of principles between Spain, Marruecos and Mauritania over the Western Sáhara” recognized as “Los Acuerdos tripartitos de Madrid” in which transferred the administration of the Sáhara to Marruecos y Mauritania. These statements consist of a political declaration, in which Spain commits itself among other questions to “respetar the opinion of the Saharawi population, through the Yemaá” (Asamblea General del Sáhara) which is the representative body of the Saharawi, and various other secrets. However, we have not published any of these publications in the State Official Gazette, but we have communicated to the United Nations with respect to their anexos secrets, so that your solo is considered a party, it is safe to mention economic, legal and political questions. In economic terms, the transfer by Spain to Marruecos of all the installations and exports of minerals from Western Sahara and 65% of the Fos Bucraa company dedicated to the exploitation of this mineral was stipulated in the same way as Marruecos ceded the recognition of derechos de pesca para 800 españoles boats. (Saharaoccidental.es)
Google.com
Kaos en la red
This is the decision ordered by the Trump administration to support brown expansionism which calls it “realistic bases” to advance in a relative autonomy (1) of the Saharawi Democratic Republic. (RASD) Undoubtedly in the trend of the Trumpian policy to establish the conduct of annexation or pressure on the gobiernos, so as to be able to access old territories, such as the case of Canada, Greenlandia, the France of Gaza and the Panama Canal.
Pablo Jofré Leal
Artículo Para Hispantv
Permitida su reproduction citando la fuente.
Source: Kaos en la red, May 5 of 2025
#WesternSahara #Polisario #Marruecos #EstadosUnidos #EEUU #Israel
Be the first to comment on "Western Sahara : Morocco, USA and Zionism : The criminal triad (Part II)"